OGame Wiki
mNo edit summary
m (formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Would it be possible to bring back the original data used to create the diameter-position probability chart? I know that I would find a more more detailed version useful, so other players probably would too. Also, I think I remember seeing it once and there weren't very many points used to determine the upper and lower 60% bounds and average of each planet. --[[User:Joedang100|Joedang100]] 17:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 
Would it be possible to bring back the original data used to create the diameter-position probability chart? I know that I would find a more more detailed version useful, so other players probably would too. Also, I think I remember seeing it once and there weren't very many points used to determine the upper and lower 60% bounds and average of each planet. --[[User:Joedang100|Joedang100]] 17:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
  +
:The current chart appears very direct and to the point. Positions 4,5,6 are the best places to try for planets and give the best probability of getting a large planet with lots of fields to develop. However, as the article states, there is a 40% chance no matter which slot you pick, that you will not get any of the sizes in the given range - you might get something bigger or way smaller (I have gotten planets in slot 4 that are 35 fields and I have gotten planets in slot 9 that are 310 fields.) So, as you can see, there is no hard and fast chart to make that will explain the randomness of planet sizes created; you will just need to be able to build a lot of colony ships and keep trying for better planet sizes (understand that you may only have 9 total planets at any given point in time, so spread your colony attempts far enough apart to give you opportunity to delete those you don't wish to keep. —[[User:Sneex|sneex]] 20:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
The current chart appears very direct and to the point. Positions 4,5,6 are the best places to try for planets and
 
give the best probability of getting a large planet with lots of fields to develop. However, as the article states,
 
there is a 40% chance no matter which slot you pick, that you will not get any of the sizes in the given range - you
 
might get something bigger or way smaller (I have gotten planets in slot 4 that are 35 fields and I have gotten planets
 
in slot 9 that are 310 fields.) So, as you can see, there is no hard and fast chart to make that will explain the
 
randomness of planet sizes created; you will just need to be able to build a lot of colony ships and keep trying for
 
better planet sizes (understand that you may only have 9 total planets at any given point in time, so spread your colony
 
attempts far enough apart to give you opportunity to delete those you don't wish to keep.
 
—— [[User:Sneex|sneex]] 20:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 22:40, 21 March 2009

Would it be possible to bring back the original data used to create the diameter-position probability chart? I know that I would find a more more detailed version useful, so other players probably would too. Also, I think I remember seeing it once and there weren't very many points used to determine the upper and lower 60% bounds and average of each planet. --Joedang100 17:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The current chart appears very direct and to the point. Positions 4,5,6 are the best places to try for planets and give the best probability of getting a large planet with lots of fields to develop. However, as the article states, there is a 40% chance no matter which slot you pick, that you will not get any of the sizes in the given range - you might get something bigger or way smaller (I have gotten planets in slot 4 that are 35 fields and I have gotten planets in slot 9 that are 310 fields.) So, as you can see, there is no hard and fast chart to make that will explain the randomness of planet sizes created; you will just need to be able to build a lot of colony ships and keep trying for better planet sizes (understand that you may only have 9 total planets at any given point in time, so spread your colony attempts far enough apart to give you opportunity to delete those you don't wish to keep. —sneex 20:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)